Summary:
– Appointment of district presidents as a headache
– Well in front of KCR .. pit behind
– Intensifying dissatisfaction at the party
– Tension that nothing will be left if they stay at the TRS party
– TRS leaders going into the touch of BJP and Congress chiefs
Political observers say the TRS appointed district presidents just for namesake. KCR was not much interested in the district party structure from the beginning. Fear haunts KCR that if someone focuses on district leaders, they will block their post tomorrow negotiate with other parties, and leave the party. Political analysts say that if anyone asks what that is, leaders are always advised that our party structure should be BSP-like. Recently, full-fledged presidents have been appointed for all the districts. Recalling that MLAs..MP..MLCs have been appointed as district presidents for most of the districts, they are analyzing the KCR strategy behind this. MLAs cannot go beyond their constituency.
Because the election atmosphere has already arrived. There is not enough time for them to fix their constituencies and there will be no time to go to the next constituency and fix the problems there. Moreover, the MLA from the next constituency in his constituency will come and point the finger, which means that the situation will not be acceptable. They also make it clear that these things are not unknown to KCR. Their analysis is that the MLAs were deliberately strategically appointed as district presidents. Because no matter whose constituency they are limited to, there is nothing you can do as district president. Political analysts say that all he is trying to convey is indirectly telling them that he will take care of it.
The situation of the MPs is the same and they have to be in alliance with the MLAs if they want to win again tomorrow. Otherwise, the MPs who are the district presidents will not rush back to the more or less district as it is difficult to win. This is also what KCR wants. There should be district presidents .. and they should not actively circle the district. This is the same Pink boss strategy. In some places, MLCs were also appointed as district presidents. No matter who they hire, they do not. If the vacant leader is handed over the responsibilities of the district presidency .. along with the fear that the whole district will make unnecessary haste and create problems in the future .. there will also be pressure to get an MLA ticket. Political observers say the TRS chief also fears the shift of his members to another party if any opportunity is not given to them.
Advertisements
All of this is good to hear. But here are some tangles. The tough talk is that many are dissatisfied with the way those in the office are being re-appointed as district presidents. We were not given nominated posts..we thought we would be given at least the district presidency responsibilities, there are already rumors that it is so unfair..whispering has started in the party ranks. Their thoughts are similar of something like what will they get if they are still at the party, except for making fool of themselves. Probably a factor as to why they’re doing so poorly – and why they’re doing so poorly. Political pundits think that the appointment of district presidents as a whole has made it very difficult for the Democratic TRS party.
