KCR’s recent views and opinions on various subjects have been misfired and are hitting back. His recent remarks that a new constitution should be drafted have provoked outrage. Many are critical of the KCR’s critique of the Constitution itself, saying that the need to draft a new constitution is to undermine the intellect of the constitution-makers and to stay within the constitutional framework.
Political scholars say that the framers of the constitution were far-sighted and that they foresaw similar situations in the future. The constitution-makers beforehand mentioned that if any mistakes are made in the implementation of the constitution in the future, the politicians and judiciary should not criticize the text. Political scholars say that only those who enforce it should be held accountable. However, they are reminded that they have been given the weapon of constitutional right to make the necessary changes and additions to the constitution in accordance with the circumstances.
Speaking of which, analysts are bashing KCR, the man who claims to have read 80,000 books, if he hasn’t read the constitution. They explain that KCR who had vowed to rule in accordance with the Constitution is now expecting that the Constitution is not correct and that the need for something new is a testament to its extreme trend.
According to KCR, he does not act in accordance with the constitution but seems to think that the constitution should be in his favor. They say his comments are meaningless. They say that the constitution has shown remedial ways for the states to gain funds and powers but that it is not right to want a new constitution.